newest 100 mentions

Does TRS let Progressives off the hook too much?

submission by SpecialFester in DarkEnlightenment

1 hour, 16 minutes ago

I won't take anything away from the Reactosphere / Race-realism based podcast "The Daily Shoah" by the TRS guys. They are brilliant and committed to put so much time into making such a high production value show(-ah) and I commend them for it and absolutely believe they are near single-handedly responsible for the explosion of interest in these ideas on the internet in the way that "A Voice for Men" can probably be credited with putting MRA's and the Manosphere on the map in 2012 and 2013 before the wide-spread proliferation of MGTOW channels, #Gamergate, anti-Feminism, etc.

Point is, I think that they are good, and they should feel good.

BUT, I can't help but feel like they let Progressives off the hook, way, wayyyyy too much just because they're huwhite. They talk of blacks especially like the evil force that must be ovened or it will destroy the world. But the Limosine Liberals, Professional Feminists, SJW Professors, even Progressive Politicians, the ones who ACTUALLY have power and opportunistically leverage this identarian Feminazi and Black Lives Matter garbage to reap benefits for theirselves are usually discussed almost quaintly. They even use the expression "SWPL" (Stuff White People Like) which usually just means a young progressive, in an almost endearing way sometimes, saying that "I'm a little SWPL sometimes" to discuss their taste in some of these things they like as well such as indie rock, craft beer, mountain climbing, etc. and act like these folks are just misguided but not half-bad just because they're WHITE.

I have to say, I completely disagree with them. I understand the desire to be liked or to fit-in, but I have absolutely no empathy for SWPLs who feel the need to virtue-signal their Progressiveness if it means spreading "Privilige Ideology" or "Patriarchy Theory" or any other of these social justice warrior Cultural Marxist mind viruses. The truth is, even though these people might be misguided, they have the ability to influence not only policy (school, local, state, federal) but are very influential on other whites, maybe even your kid sister who's in her teens a and very impressionable, maybe your son who's going to be killed because he buys into their egalitarian narrative and decides to try to help some inner-city "youfs"? Also, the moral support emboldens the mongrels in the Black Lives Matter movement, or the Pakis rapin' little girls in Rotherham.

My point is, white Progressives LET women have the vote. White Progressives, LET the destructive results of the 60s civil rights struggles become Constitutional law. White Progressives rule the universities and make up the vocal part of the student bodies, that insisted on multicultural club funding to be available for every Asian Club, Latino Club, TransMartianEskimoPansexualOtherkin Club, but shuts it down when a group of students by the exact same standards and stipulations starts a White Club.

Even the Jews play second fiddler on the roof to the Dindu blacks. I consider them more like a rodent infestation in one's farm. You want to deal with them sternly and swiftly to do whatever it takes to erradicate the problem. Poisoning, gassing, drowning, etc. Because they do real damage. But you don't really ENJOY it, you would be fine with just getting them all to leave the barn, but don't take pleasure in torturing them, as they are just a pest pursuing their interest in a way that conflicts with yours and in your territory.

But with Progressives, it's a whole different story. They are your own, and they are traitors, willing to sell-out their own people down the river, and throw them under the bus for not even sheckels, but just for kudos. And they do it underhandedly, and they do it shamelessly. They are opportunists, and MUCH more deadly than the mere pests.

At the video game museum in Berlin.

comment by nrvnpc in gaming

1 hour, 33 minutes ago

See: How the internet pictures feminism.

The words of a feminist author bell hooks - Read if you dare!

submission by edhredhr in TheRedPill

4 hours, 30 minutes ago

“Simply put, feminism is a movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation, and oppression. This was a definition of feminism I offered in Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center more than 10 years ago. It was my hope at the time that it would become a common definition everyone would use. I liked this definition because it did not imply that men were the enemy. By naming sexism as the problem it went directly to the heart of the matter. Practically, it is a definition which implies that all sexist thinking and action is the problem, whether those who perpetuate it are female or male, child or adult. It is also broad enough to include an understanding of systemic institutionalized sexism. As a definition it is open-ended. To understand feminism it implies one has to necessarily understand sexism.” ― bell hooks, Feminism Is for Everybody: Passionate Politics

Anybody want to criticize?

Even the anchors looked like they had enough of her. Classic.

comment by Ben--Affleck in videos

4 hours, 32 minutes ago

It's hard to tell who's the feminist anyways. Self-proclaimed feminists aren't feminists and normal people who believe in equality tend to not self-proclaim they're feminists... and since no one can define what true equality is, and thus what true feminism is, we're left all confused and misusing the word, as I just did. Did I just confuse things more?

Reddit, what is the most cringeworthy word you can think of that is worse than "moist"?

comment by flowerswhenyouredead in AskReddit

5 hours, 3 minutes ago

Ok. Then why is feminist a cringe-worthy word to you? According to Merriam-Webster dictionary feminism means, "the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities."

Radical Feminism has made me a bit sexist

submission by Arimaster in confession

5 hours, 21 minutes ago

[Remorse]: If you feel bad

I'll give a bit of premise for this post. I am a male freshman in high school, who before this summer was a bit of a jerk. Over this time, I've come to some realizations about myself and what I believe in. Now, I am an avid supporter of the core ideals of Gamergate. Call me what you will, have whatever opinion you want, all I know is that I, personally, side with GG. I had a bunch of female friends before I stated this opinion to them, and now they all hate or ridicule me. They are all avid feminists, and whenever I suggest that the SJW way of thinking may not be accurate, instead of giving me a reason to question that belief, they pushed me away. This has been happening with every single one of my female friends. It has gained such a uniformity that I don't know if I trust women any more. I just want to be able to say what I want to say without being ostracized for having an opinion, and none of my female friends let me do that. I'm beginning to sympathize with racists now, because even though their beliefs are wrong, they should be allowed to believe them...shouldn't they? As long as nobody starts the KKK, shouldn't you be allowed just to think what you want?

I don't know. Maybe I'm just an asshole who doesn't understand anything. But it just seems to me that people will always have differing opinions. Why would you make people afraid of them?

Who is spinning in their grave the hardest?

comment by TheWildRover_ in AskReddit

8 hours, 13 minutes ago

Helen Keller. Feminism is a nightmare and modern feminists are working hard to undo the things she and other suffragettes worked so hard for.

keeping track of 677,817 reddits

about

help

links